The Disney brass' statement seeks to avoid "undervaluing" their content... what that usually means is that the content provider expects to be paid something more than they've been getting, though how much more is obviously the subject of negotiation. If that doesn't happen, the carrier is cut off. B
M-D November, to Kevin M and moi, Sept 3rd; emphasis added: I'm curious because I'm seeing a lot people blaming one side or the other - in situations like this, does the carrier (DirecTV) cut off the signal from the source (Disney), or is the source no longer delivering to the carrier? There are a lot of online commenters who are quick to blame Disney's greed but act like DirecTV is an innocent victim in all this, but what's the real story? Could DTV turn the signal back on if they wanted to, or *has Disney plugged the well?* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/0b5aa905-b1fc-41bb-9e24-8b12fa0db5acn%40googlegroups.com.
