Before the same judge that once ruled that Spencer Elden filed his original complaint over the *Nevermind* cover photo after a statute of limitations expired, only to have it tossed right back in his lap by an appeals panel... this round he rehashed parts of the first ruling about the lack of "lascivious" content, along with Elden's embracing of the role in recent years, not only of the title: https://www.billboard.com/pro/nirvana-nevermind-album-cover-lawsuit-naked-baby-dismissed/ (link, not paywalled when I tried it through Newser <https://www.newser.com/story/376224/judge-nirvanas-famous-album-cover-isnt-porn.html> (link) B
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/a50535e2-0000-433e-8de6-6970f0b8cf43n%40googlegroups.com.
