All that means is that the lawyers were Johnny(!) on the spot with their advice to Steve straightaway the segment concluded, and since the crowd was still in their seats expecting the featured guest Jen Garner, they got to partake in the explanation pronto, contradicting my earlier position that it was afterward as Mark wished... CBS issued a statement clarifying that they would have liked that Steve plan to have the other candidates on later shows to satisfy the equal-time requirement, but that he made the decision to move the segment to the 'toob: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/just-in-cbs-hits-back-at-colbert-over-yanked-talarico-interview-claim/ (link) Remember, it's been three weeks or so since the FCC chairman put his (webbed) foot down... B
Mark Jeffries, to moi, Feb 17th: It would have been better if Colbert had just done a straight-to-camera, no studio audience explanation of the whole thing, with no graphics, no cued boos from the audience and no gratuitous Arby's joke (what is it with Colbert and chain restaurants--doesn't he realize who some of his advertisers are?). It's like he can't do anything without his shtick. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/31475668-8555-4886-b7fe-44035486633bn%40googlegroups.com.
