Titus, back on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:08:54 -0800: [...] > First off, I seem to recall that the spidermonkey stuff is (according to > the author) a nearly unrecoverable mess. [...]
Well, not quite: it's certainly a mess ATM -- it was just a "0.0.1" release, after all! -- but certainly not an unrecoverable one, IMHO. OTOH, I'd quite understand if anybody other than me wouldn't want to work with it until I'd cleaned it up a lot, of course! (and that's not likely to happen :-( ) By far the worst part was the DOM stuff rather than python-spidermonkey. I certainly planned the DOM code as a prototype to throw away later. Still, I've seen much cleaner-looking spidermonkey wrapper code since (some of which I posted to the wwwsearch-general list), so maybe even I would start afresh, I guess that's possible. I've heard of a few people actually using it (some even for real work, which does scare me ;-). John _______________________________________________ twill mailing list [email protected] http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/twill
