Can someone explain the flexibility of the MIT X License with regard to derivative works? Can the license be changed? Does the original copyright holders name have to be included in the derivative work as well? I would guess at a "no" but I would like to confirm.
Thanks Manohar On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Manohar Vanga <[email protected]>wrote: > Ah never mind. ezXML seems to be under the MIT license. That should be > liberal enough for me :-) > > Thanks > Manohar > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Imran Khan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ezxml/ >> >> http://www.libexpat.org/ >> >> You can google out too. Also there is a wealth of information and tools on >> sourceforge.net. >> >> HTH >> - Imran. >> >> >> --- On *Fri, 3/19/10, sunil rathour <[email protected]>* wrote: >> >> >> From: sunil rathour <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [twincling] XML Parsing in C >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 10:19 AM >> >> >> Hi All, >> Even i am also looking for the same minimalistic XML parsing library for >> C, Please can you guys pass me as well.... >> Thanks :) >> Best Regards >> Sunil >> >> On 19 March 2010 08:51, Manohar Vanga >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am looking for an extremely minimalistic XML parsing library for C >>> under Linux. I want a library that simply lets me traverse around nodes >>> easily based on their name and get the value of the nodes and its >>> attributes. All the ones I looked at are too bloated up and provide for the >>> entire XML specification. >>> >>> Any suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Manohar >>> >> >> >> >
