On Jan 25, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >>> >>> Can we go ahead and close 2842 in favor of 4814? We have too many old >>> tickets floating around... >> >> #4814 is already closed. If the #2842 description is confusing, then >> feel free to update it to be more clear. :) >> >> We don't close old tickets as duplicates of new tickets, though. That >> doesn't make sense, and it's annoying to the original reporter/cc list >> as well. >>> > > Honestly, whether 4814 or 2842 is the main ticket for the problem > doesn't matter to me. I'd just like to get the fix put in. I believe > my patch is attached to 2842 when 4814 got closed as a dup.
Shouldn't 2842 be in review, then? (In case you're not familiar with them: <http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/ReviewProcess>, <http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedDevelopment>.) _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
