On 06:16 pm, michae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 February 2011 14:06, Jason Heeris <jason.hee...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 February 2011 21:30, �<exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
Not intentionally:
�http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3690
Interesting...
As an aside, the problem of serial port availability for unit tests is
something I've encountered before too. I solved it by using "socat" to
create virtual serial ports with known names (paths on *nix, COM
numbers on Windows), and ran my tests using that. In fact, the test
for the patch in #3690 only requires that the port exists, not that it
does anything, which is even easier than actually requiring the port
to do anything.
I'm in the process of writing a mock that will allow the serial port
testing to work without a physical port as I think this is the best
solution for the Twisted build farm. I have the posix part done and a
plan for the windows version, using named pipes.
Awesome!
Jean-Paul
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
