Hi Ilja, |--==> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:02:43 +0200, Jamu Kakar <[email protected]> said:
JK> Hi Ilja, JK> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ilja Livenson <[email protected]> wrote: >>basically, $subj. I really like the DeferredStore concept introduced >>in storm/twisted-integration, but it seems that that branch is lagging >>behind on merging (for 2 years now). Any inside info, perhaps? JK> The branch is not being actively maintained, though I do believe some JK> folks are using it in production systems. The way we've been JK> recommending people use Storm with Twisted is by running transactions JK> in threads with deferToThread. Free recently landed some code in JK> storm.twisted.transact that makes pursuing this model, with a thread JK> pool, fairly straightforward. What Jamu said. Considering that the branch you're mentioning does use threads as well, the storm.twisted.transact is probably easier and virtually identical as far as performance goes. Cheers, Free _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
