On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com>wrote:
> The main thing that web2 did wrong was introducing a new namespace and > thereby confusion, not any particular detail of its implementation. > Well, my thing would introduce some namespaces (like "entity")-- just not one in the toplevel twisted package. > The web2 resource model was in most ways a nice upgrade from twisted.web. > It even had a halfway decent compatibility layer. You should feel free to > copy its implementation liberally (with the exception of the IStream > interface, which has been discussed to death elsewhere). However, since > web2 was half-baked in some regards, you may need to add test coverage, > improve docstrings, or handle some corner cases in order to pass review. > > Of course -- I'd end up doing that anyway because I wouldn't feel confident I understand the code otherwise. > But, in terms of implementation details, web2 was in fact "doing it right" > for the most part. > Glad to know it's not just my mangled mind. > > -glyph > > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python > -- cheers lvh
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
