On 02:20 am, ita...@futurefoundries.com wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Jonathan Jacobs <
>jonathan+twis...@jsphere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Should the IRI branch be finished before attempting this ticket? (Note
>>that this doesn't necessarily include my volunteering.)
>The IRI ticket should *not* be a dependency. It would be nice, but it's
>unlikely it will happen anytime soon.
The hard part of the IRI ticket is parsing all the extremely complex
forms in which an IRI can appear, right?
If so, I agree. However, there's no reason we can't have an object that
represents an IRI *without* writing a parser for all those forms. Agent
only needs minimal functionality of being able to figure out the
hostname, port number, and whatever makes up the rest.
Jean-Paul
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
