Am 17.02.2014 um 23:58 schrieb Dustin J. Mitchell <dus...@v.igoro.us>:
> Async programming aside, this mode of chaining multiple methods > doesn't sit well with me: > > def A() > # .. do stuff > B() > > def B() > # .. do stuff > C() > > I think it'd be more idiomatic to have a controlling method that > indicates the chaning: > > def do_stuffs(): > A() > B() > C() > D() > D() > D() > > Now, translating that to async programming with inline callbacks is easy: > > @defer.inlineCallbacks > def do_stuffs() > yield A() > yield B() > yield C() > yield D() > yield D() > yield D() > > Dustin Thanks, but the calls in C depend on the data (program branches). There are 8 different call parameter sets dependent on contexts. Axel --- PGP-Key:29E99DD6 ☀ +49 151 2300 9283 ☀ computing @ chaos claudius _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
