On 27 May 2016 at 13:13, Itamar Turner-Trauring <ita...@itamarst.org> wrote:
> >> [snip] I think they're fine to accept insofar as: > > 1. There is strong ongoing momentum for the port now, so these changes > makes porting module-by-module easier and won't just bitrot. > How do you define a "strong ongoing momentum" ? > 2. They're doing one particular incompatibility at a time, rather than > "here's an assortment of random changes to a module that may or may not > port that module fully, who knows." > > Some code parts don't have python 2.7 coverage . Is is still acceptable to touch that code ? :) Regards, Adi -- Adi Roiban
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
