+1 from me as well. Depending directly on how twisted installs itself seems problematic. In my opinion, the more we discourage this practice the better.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 8:00 PM Tristan Seligmann <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 from me > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 02:35 Craig Rodrigues <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> I understand the motivation, but the time to have done this was when >> dist.py >> was originally reviewed. >> >> There are real problems in the Twisted code, and in the Twisted >> infrastructure. >> Focusing on something like this instead of those problems seems pointless, >> gratuitous and of little benefit. >> > > The problem is that if we defer this change until later, it becomes a lot > more work then. If we do it now, while nobody is depending on the module, > then we save ourselves that work in future by doing a trivial amount of > work now. > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > [email protected] > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python > -- - Chris
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
