> On 11 Jun 2017, at 17:05, Glyph <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 10, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Amber Hawkie Brown <hawk...@atleastfornow.net >> <mailto:hawk...@atleastfornow.net>> wrote: >> >> We currently have no 3.3 or 3.4 builders except on Travis, so these Python >> versions aren't really "fully supported" per our policy > > Why don't travis builders imply full support? My understanding was that CI > == supported. > > (This is just a procedural concern, I am fine with dropping >2.7<3.5 in the > proposed release.) > > -glyph
Our policy says "buildbot builder" explicitly as the basis for support. Plus, Travis is some Pythons yolo'd onto a random Ubuntu for the purposes of smoke testing for people without access to our full build fleet; and the support for Python in Twisted has so far been on the basis of "what are people actually using" -- hence why we don't have a 3.3 or 3.4, as they are only generally available on EOL'd or enterprise distributions (which are unlikely to be used by people who want/can get the newest Twisted). - Amber
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
