Good point. Thanks for responding. But, is the above way of using dictionary as cache correct? Or is there a "deffered" way of doing this? All I want is an inmemory cache that is compatible with this async paradigm?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:45 PM Gelin Yan <dynami...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I don't see any reason to use defer.inlineCallbacks in your snippet of > codes. > > Regards > > gelin yan > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python >
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
