I am a bit more confused after this than before :-) How can Avatar be a resource? It represents the actual user, correct? Isnt' there a concept of a Principal / User that has nothing to do with actual URL responses / routing / etc.
Sorry if I am asking basic questions, but sometimes it is hard to figure out from the high-level docs how all the pieces fit together... Thank you in advance Jacek On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Glyph <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote: > > But there are no examples on how a Resource method (let;s say render_GET) > could get access to the current Avatar object? > > > The avatar is a resource, and therefore it can pass itself (or any > relevant authentication or authorization information) to its children as > they are created. > > twisted.web doesn't implement role-based authorization or anything like > it. If it did, it would use a specific object that implemented that > role-based auth, not the avatar (which is an implementation of a protocol > interface). > > And does the Avatar object need to implement some specific interface? > > > Yes, the Avatar object must provide IResource. > > -glyph > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-web mailing list > [email protected] > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web > >
_______________________________________________ Twisted-web mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web
