Great, thanks! It would be great if someone had done comparisons with txZMQ<https://github.com/smira/txZMQ>as well but I guess I'll have to play with that myself.
Jacek On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote: > > I am trying to do some research on what is the most performant method for > a Twisted server to speak to a client running in a separate process. > > > The default solution in Twisted seems to be Perspective Broker, but then > there is AMP and Foolscap as well. > > Has anyone ever done any benchmarks comparing those? I'd like to have an > idea as to which one is most likely to give me the best performance. > > > AMP is fastest. It's not really possible to *directly* compare, because > PB and Foolscap respectively have more features, but compare here: > > > http://speed.twistedmatrix.com/timeline/?exe=2%2C4&base=none&ben=pb&env=d3&revs=200 > > and > > > http://speed.twistedmatrix.com/timeline/?exe=2%2C4&base=none&ben=amp&env=d3&revs=200 > > You're of course welcome to contribute optimizations to PB :). > > -glyph > > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-web mailing list > [email protected] > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web > >
_______________________________________________ Twisted-web mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web
