Any reason not to replace AMP with Websocket?
Autobahn's implementation has worked well for me on Twisted.
Chris
On 24/08/2021 08:18, Ian Haywood wrote:
I need to push messages to clients stuck behind a firewall. Existing
solutions use polling of various forms. AMP would be perfect but for
the 64k field size limit.
There has been a previous attempt to address this
(https://github.com/twisted/twisted/pull/1417) however this was
reverted with a request to split the PR into the type annotations
(presumably uncontroversial) and the protocol changes.
The original contributor has done the type annotations
(https://github.com/twisted/twisted/pull/1459) but they seem to be in
"review queue hell" Can someone take a look and either merge it or
specify what further work needs to be done?
With regard to the protocol changes there was discussion of using
netstrings. Is there any interest in a AMPv2 based on netstrings?
Ian
_______________________________________________
Twisted mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/twisted.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/S7WGX4UIVVJEKRHNNSBRRUBWSHZ3QVSX/
Code of Conduct: https://twisted.org/conduct
_______________________________________________
Twisted mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/twisted.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/T6LEOEIRM73UPEAAQER7XMBQOJMBD5ZW/
Code of Conduct: https://twisted.org/conduct
