On Sun, Feb 20, 2022, at 13:44, Chris Withers wrote:
> At this point, it feels like any available energy could be more usefully 
> employed in getting a pytest plugin that really supported the Twisted 
> reactor in place. Re-inventing wheels like coverage just doesn't seem 
> sensible at this point.

I don't expect to invest a lot of time in pytes-twisted, but I am curious what 
you mean by supporting the Twisted reactor in place.  A new reactor for each 
test?

Cheers,
-kyle
_______________________________________________
Twisted mailing list -- twisted@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to twisted-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/twisted.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/twisted@python.org/message/7KFG4O2VBV4ZSPOK4Z5RQ5PZGZDTZNEU/
Code of Conduct: https://twisted.org/conduct

Reply via email to