• k...@krot.org [2024-12-14 18:18]: [...] > In November last year I challenged myself with a task to make a service > monitoring solution to replace NodePing for me, and I was considering > asyncio vs Twisted. In the end, I went with the asyncio route and managed to > get away using just standard Python libs (to run checks, and to send alerts, > I use external commands such as ping/ping6, drill, ldns-dane, nc, curl -- > especially the latter is able do do *a lot*). Now I'm tempted to make it > work under Twisted, too. The checks themselves are not themselves dependent > on asyncio, so I'd have to orchestrating facilities, including some queue.
so now I've got a prototype, a simple test run with 100K checks on my 3 y.o. thinkpad gives me 1425 check/second with twisted and 1130 check/second with asyncio and standard loop and something very horrible with asyncio with uvloop. the checks were simple calls to /usr/bin/true, which always succeeds. that's more that enough for my needs (I'm doing about 2-3 check/second), so I'll see if I can complete the twisted version of the mointor and have it run along the current one. in any case, I have a possible other usage in sight: custom auth <-> ldap proxy via ldaptor (to see if it would work with stalwart mail server). this is fun! _______________________________________________ Twisted mailing list -- twisted@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to twisted-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/twisted.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/twisted@python.org/message/FQHJZWMYSLR7M7SYDNMELRZKF4CSCHAW/ Code of Conduct: https://twisted.org/conduct
