It depends on what you're trying to accomplish. In general, bootstrap 2.0 is a lot easier to work with along with Telerik because they style less of the default elements, like <table>. In 2.0, they require you to add some class to a <table> element, which means that they don't try to style a Telerik grid, for example. This makes it look better.
What you won't get is a "Bootstrap themed" version of the Telerik controls. Continuing with the Telerik grid example, if you use that in conjunction with Bootstrap it will look like a Telerik grid, not a Bootstrap table, with it's nice pager buttons, etc. That will take a lot of work to change, and I don't recommend it. Telerik emits html with its own CSS class names and mapping that back to Bootstrap would be a chore. I've found, actually, that with Bootstrap I use a lot less of Telerik than I did before, and just use more straight html + Bootstrap. If you do decide to integrate Telerik in your site, I recommend the Telerik "Simple" theme, which seems to match Bootstrap's default colors best. On Jan 4, 1:20 pm, Nilesh Kinge <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone tried bootstrap with asp.net MVC Telerik components? are both > compatible? > I anyone is having a sample project?
