I'm curious which is better in terms of valid semantic markup & flexibility. I most probably have this all wrong but from what I understand background image glyphicons would probably be more valid but has less flexibility in terms of design sizing. But if we used a glyf font the design options would be more but the content(read by search engines) would most likely be read as an out of context character. Any Thoughts... --
Phil Doughty *T*: +971 50 8879936 On 9 May 2012 14:37, Faz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The only way would be to use background-size property but If the bg size > change, every bg-position defined in the css won't be correct anymore > Increasing the container can be done simply by using a margin. It will have > the same visual effect > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Faz" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>, < > [email protected]> > Subject: Re: Making glyphicons larger > Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 12:10 pm > > Do you want a bigger icon or, a bigger icon container ? > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Andrew" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Making glyphicons larger > Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 11:49 am > > Hello, > > I am trying to override the default glyphicons size. Trying these > approaches didn't work: > > .i { > [class*=" icon-"] { > width: 24px; > height: 24px; > background-position: 24px 24px; > } > } > > or > > [class*=" icon-"] { > width: 24px; > height: 24px; > background-position: 24px 24px; > } > > Does anyone know of a better approach? > > Thanks, > > Andrew >
