Done, and thanks!

http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=142

-ch


On Nov 6, 1:20 pm, Matt Sanford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -to: not working is indeed a bug. I'm working on a fix right now.
>
> As for the searching for replies, that seems like a good feature to
> add. Until recently the reply_to_id was wrong too often, but with some
> recent API additions that should no longer be the case. Please file an
> issue athttp://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issuesand I'll see if
> we can get it into a future release.
>
> Thanks;
>   — Matt Sanford
>
> On Nov 6, 10:55 am, "Damon Clinkscales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Craig Hockenberry
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1) The ability to search for replies to a given tweet ID. The use case
> > > for this is when someone asks a question like "What's the best place
> > > to get T-shirts printed in small runs?". The only way to search for
> > > answers is by using the original poster's screen_name, which contains
> > > a lot of noise in the results. Specifying the original tweet's ID
> > > would be much more accurate (now that clients like Twitterrific are
> > > starting to set it when replies are posted.)
>
> > +1
>
> > > 2) I'd like to do a search for "@chockenberry" that are not replies to
> > > me. Periodically, I do searches to see what people are saying about
> > > me. I'm not in interested in "@chockenberry This a reply", I'm
> > > interested in "Just saw @chockenberry and man is he tall." A vanity
> > > mode :-)
>
> > Yeah, that'd be nice.
>
> > What's weird is that this works:
>
> >http://search.twitter.com/search?q=+chockenberry+-from%3Achockenberry
>
> > but this doesn't
>
> >http://search.twitter.com/search?q=+chockenberry+-to%3Achockenberry
>
> > could just be a bug.
>
> > -damon

Reply via email to