very true. I did a 'god mode' experiment for about a week (did you
ever play the game Doom years ago?) followed about 45,000 and had
roughly 3,000 followers. i didn't tweet much of anything, it was all
fiercely automated. and i certainly didn't read all of those posts.
It's truly not really that interesting to have so many followers
artificially, as i couldn't possibly think of anything useful to tell
them all, and it was really just a big 'whirly gig' in the ethers. But
a curious experiment anyway.



On Dec 8, 8:01 pm, "Amir Michail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, you could try following a huge number of people on twitter
> in the hope that some of them would follow you in return.  But that
> might be seen as spamming.  Moreover, these people probably won't look
> at your tweets seriously anyway (as there is no CAPTCHA), so they are
> unlikely to follow you.
>
> Amir
>
>
>
>
>
> > Amir
>
> >> Not cutting, just trying to understand.
>
> >> Waitman
>
> >> On Dec 8, 7:11 pm, "Amir Michail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> > ...
>
> >>> > Anyways, back to the original topic.
>
> >>> > I don't understand WHERE these "Them" are going to submit. (re:
> >>> > original post). I guess that's what I'm missing.
>
> >>> > Waitman
>
> >>> At the service using the twitter API that I'm thinking of building.  I
> >>> didn't realize this idea was so difficult to understand though.  Maybe
> >>> I shouldn't even try...
>
> >>> Amir
>
> >>> > On Dec 8, 5:54 pm, Cameron Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> >> It's because people who are new, or considered new due to few posts, 
> >>> >> are
> >>> >> automatically put in the moderation queue.
> >>> >> spam, which I'm sure
>
> >>> --http://b4utweet.comhttp://chatbotgame.comhttp://numbrosia.comhttp://t...
>
> > --
> >http://b4utweet.com
> >http://chatbotgame.com
> >http://numbrosia.com
> >http://twitter.com/amichail
>
> --http://b4utweet.comhttp://chatbotgame.comhttp://numbrosia.comhttp://twitter.com/amichail

Reply via email to