2009/1/7 Patrick Minton <[email protected]>:
> Since you get user objects 100 at a time, you would have to query
> about an unreasonable number of users for this to be a problem imho.
>
> Lextweet.com follows about 700 lawyers.  This may grow to 2000.  20
> API calls an hour is a problem for the API?  I doubt it.  If it is,
> though, I'd be more than happy to reduce the frequency.

My point was that there's no need to hit the API at all unless you get
a 404 from the avatar URL. Why call the API if you don't need to?
Seems like a pointless waste of resources to me.

-Stuart

-- 
http://stut.net/

> On Jan 7, 2009, at 1:45 AM, Stuart wrote:
>
>>
>> 2009/1/7 Patrick Minton <[email protected]>:
>>> Yes, but once you have the url, why store the actual .png locally?
>>> Sure, if a user changes their profile image you may have a broken
>>> link, but
>>> you can update profile info every hour or so, thus making it a non-
>>> issue.
>>
>> I don't think Twitter would see it as a non-issue if your service has
>> more than a few users and you start requesting their details every
>> hour. A better option is to attempt to download their avatar and only
>> request their profile and update it if you get a 404.
>>
>> -Stuart
>>
>> --
>> http://stut.net/
>
> Patrick Minton
> IT Director
> LexBlog, Inc.
> +1 206 697 4548
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to