I must apologize. I feel silly now.

I've been reading that API doc daily for a week, and I never once
noticed I could up the count on the initial request. (I guess I saw
the '20' in the description, and figured that was it.)

That will definitely solve my problem. Thanks for opening my eyes, and
I'm sorry for this!

-Ryan

On Jan 13, 9:08 am, Matt Sanford <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
>      I'm not sure if we could support this sort of whitelisting/
> blacklisting on our side but I'll keep it in mind when working on the  
> new API. In the mean time perhaps you can use a larger count parameter  
> on the friends_timeline method. Rather than 20 you can use count=100  
> and it should minimize your problem.
>
> Thanks;
>    — Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
>
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:36 AM, TweetByMail wrote:
>
>
>
> > Working on my filters at TweetByMail (sending twitter updates via
> > email... basically a SMS service replacement/stand-in).
>
> > I have a filter set up on my end that can either whitelist or
> > blacklist a set of friend usernames. A person may want to read all the
> > updates on the web, but only want a select few emailed to them.
>
> > The potential problem is that I am filtering AFTER retrieving the
> > (maximum of) 20 most recent updates. If your whitelist is a small
> > percentage of your total friends, all 20 updates might get filtered
> > out and you'll miss updates that you actually want on your whitelist.
>
> > If the friends_timeline request could be submitted by POST, you could
> > add two parameters:
>
> > filtertype - Either 'whitelist' or 'blacklist'
> > filterusers - A list of usernames to be filtered
>
> > The alternative solution (which I'm not planning/wanting to do) would
> > required more traffic through the API... either more frequent
> > friends_timeline requests, or even worse... individually requesting
> > updates for each whitelisted username.
>
> > Just a feature I would selfishly enjoy... but I can see it coming in
> > handy for other people, too.
>
> > Thanks for all your efforts, Alex. It's been nice and easy developing
> > with the Twitter API!
>
> > -Ryan

Reply via email to