I disagree with SimX. I consider this change very useful and necessary since it does organize the conversation properly. Consider that many people use @replies to start a conversation with another user, not necessarily to reply to *any* preexisting tweet. If all you need is an upper bound, just use the reply's post time.
- "in reply to" metadata missing for manual repli... simX
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for man... Jesse Stay
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for man... Aditya
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for... Steve Brunton
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing... Christopher
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing... simX
- Re: "in reply to" metadata mis... Fábio Silva
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for man... Stuart
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for... PockeTwitDev
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for... Cameron Kaiser
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for man... TCI
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for man... simX
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing for... Damon C
- Re: "in reply to" metadata missing... simX
- [twitter-dev] Re: "in reply to"... simX
- [twitter-dev] Re: "in reply to... Chad Etzel
- [twitter-dev] Re: "in reply to... atebits
- [twitter-dev] Re: "in repl... simX
- [twitter-dev] Re: "in ... Abraham Williams
- [twitter-dev] Re: "in ... Cameron Kaiser
