It is a valid thing *worth* pointing out, that if some of us are waiting over a week (10 days so far for me iirc), and the lead API developer is still saying 72 hours, that there might be a problem, and the only way Twitter can know of the problem is if we post our feedback on it.
My intention in writing my above post was to make sure that Alex was *aware* that things were moving even slower than as he stated, I have indeed read the other posts in this group, having been lurking here since starting work on my small twitter project, and I am fully aware that the API demands are busy at the moment, especially with the OAUTH beta currently undergoing trial. I was not asking for miracles, I was not complaining, and I wasn't even asking for the process to be faster, I was just stating the facts as they were, from my own research, asking people on Twitter + other developer groups whether they had had any response in the past week. And as a side note, your above posts are unnecessarily snide/ confrontational, the one I am replying to in particular, as if you actually *want* to rile me up. Please don't do this, there are nicer ways of saying what you wanted to say. Rob On Feb 2, 2:02 pm, Cameron Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh faff off, there is no need for that tone, I was merely stating the > > facts, which includes exactly what you just said too. > > > If you want to have an argument on free beer, api requests or > > whatever, then I have a lot to say that I am not saying, because this > > is not the place for it. > > That's good. > > -- > ------------------------------------ personal:http://www.cameronkaiser.com/-- > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems *www.floodgap.com* [email protected] > -- Are you ready for de BIG FUN?? Yeah! -- Headmaster Kuno, "Ranma 1/2" > -------
