Maybe we've made a terrible omission in our documentation, but the "count" parameter is for limiting downwards, not upwards. If you only want 5 statuses in a timeline rather than 20, "count" is a-okay. But it isn't meant for pushing up the number of statuses returned.

Damon C wrote:
Twitter-folk,

I would really love to decrease the run-time on TweetStats by
utilizing the ?count parameter on the user_timeline method. However,
more often than not, increasing count above 750 or so simply errors
out or requires numerous attempts to be successful. (I should also
mention that the errors are the standard Twitter "over capacity" HTML,
as opposed to an API 503 response).

Should I stop trying to grab timeline information in one chunk and
continue to issue incremental (but numerous) requests with a small
count parameter? Your advice is appreciated.

And the token "thank you" for making the vast amount of info that is
Twitter so readily available. :)

Damon

--
Damon P. Cortesi
Security guy, Weekend Haxor
tweetstats.com | tweepsearch.com

Reply via email to