Or, do both.
Allow them to "login" via OAuth, and then let them create an account
later to avoid future round-trips (or to associate multiple twitter
accounts)
This is what http://feedflix.com does with the Netflix OAuth API.

On Mar 1, 6:18 pm, Paul Kinlan <paul.kin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I think most things other than a basic username and password will confuse
> most people, which is why asking for their twitter username and password is
> done (rightly or wrongly) because people know it, use it all the time on
> twitter and don't have to remember yet another password.
>
> I will give JainRains solution a look over. Trouble is, it looks two phase,
> log-in via openId/facebook/etc then hook up your twitter account (using
> oAuth); obviously once you have set up your twitter account your only ever
> have to log in using the JainRain stuff.  I do like using the twitter
> account and password (like many app developers) because its central, you can
> verifiy the details and let people use your service in one simple step and
> you don't need another external sevice to authenticate against.  I just
> worry that using external services will limit who uses Twitter apps, and I
> also worry that managing the credentials myself will negate all the benefits
> that oAuth provides (because most people will use the same password as their
> twitter password).
>
> Onhttp://oauth.twe2.comyou only ever type anything when you are redirected
> to Twitters site, twe2 doesn't ask for anything ever.  In my opinon it is
> the cleanest thing from a UX point of view, however, it's not (from what I
> have been told) how your supposed to use oAuth.
>
> Paul.
>
> 2009/3/1 Sam K Sethi <samkse...@googlemail.com>
>
> > Hi Paul
>
> > As you know we already have a working version of Twitters OAuth on a test
> > sitehttp://ouath.twitblogs.comand will integrate into our live site when
> > twitter let us.  The way we are looking to overcome the user login issue is
> > to use JainRain'swww.rpxnow.comand associate a users ID to their OAuth
> > token.
>
> > Our worry is will this all confuse non-technical users
>
> > Thanks in advance
>
> > Sam
>
> >www.twitblogs.com/
>
> > This email is: [ ] bloggable [ ] twittable [ ] ask first [X] private
>
> > 2009/3/1 Dossy Shiobara <do...@panoptic.com>
>
> >> On 3/1/09 1:28 PM, Petermdenton wrote:
>
> >>> Dossy, serioulsy, no one is saying the sky is falling. This list is for
> >>> application developers to discuss development topics as they please. You
> >>> may know everything, but for those of us who wish to discuss
>
> >> We need to resist spreading FUD.  Twitter has its problems, but creating
> >> ones where there aren't any helps no one.
>
> >> --
> >> Dossy Shiobara              | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/
> >> Panoptic Computer Network   |http://panoptic.com/
> >>  "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
> >>    folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)

Reply via email to