I've never written a BB app, but is there not a way to force the display size of an image like you can in an html <img> tag?
...not that it would help the filesize issue associated with this problem. -chad On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Jason Schroeder <jasch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is a 480x480 _normal image: > http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitter_production/profile_images/108666778/IMG00099_normal.jpg > > Any progress on working with the UX team to resize these? TwitterBerry > is expecting a 48x48-pixel image. > > Cheers, > Jason > TwitterBerry > > On Mar 24, 7:49 am, Shannon Whitley <shannon.whit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Don't forget the _mini. :) >> >> This is my list: >> >> (original) >> _mini >> _normal >> _bigger >> >> On Feb 25, 12:15 am, Dave Briccetti <da...@davebsoft.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi. I’ve searched around for 1/2 hour or so, and haven’t found an >> > authoritative explanation of the sizes of pictures, and how to >> > retrieve them. >> >> > It seems that profile_image_url leads to a tiny picture: >> > http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitter_production/profile_images/66123958/IM... >> >> > But there is also a slighter bigger version: >> > http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitter_production/profile_images/66123958/IM... >> >> > And then a proper full-size one: >> > http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitter_production/profile_images/66123958/IM... >> >> > Am I correct in this? That the big version URL can be derived from >> > that in profile_image_url by dropping the _normal from the name? Is >> > this part of the API spec? Safe to use? >> >> > Thanks.
