This is something else that could go on a "best practices" page on the
apiwiki.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 15:50, Doug Williams <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree. I'm all for convention... It helps users navigate and build
> confidence in the Twitter experience, where ever it may be.
>
> Doug Williams
> Twitter API Support
> http://twitter.com/dougw
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Abraham Williams <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I don't link the @ sign because 1) I don't like how it looks and 2)
>> Twitter.com does not.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:21, Chad Etzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A more lighthearted discussion to see where people stand on this
>>> convention.
>>>
>>> We all know the convention of prefixing usernames with the @ symbol,
>>> the interesting thing I notice is that different sites (and even
>>> within tiwtter's site itself) decide to link or not link the @ symbol
>>> along with it.
>>>
>>> Main twitter site: is NOT linked
>>> search.twitter.com: IS linked
>>> new twitter integrated sidebar search: IS linked (i suppose this uses
>>> the same code as search.twitter)
>>>
>>> TweetGrid: is NOT linked
>>> Tweetie: IS linked
>>> etc..
>>>
>>> just curious how people decided which convention to use.
>>>
>>> From a visual perspective I prefer having the @ be plaintext since it
>>> provides a nice visual difference looking at word, whereas normal
>>> links are bounded by whitespace.  This makes the usernames pop out (to
>>> my eyes anyway).
>>>
>>> -Chad
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com
>> Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
>> Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
>> This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
>> Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
>
>
>


-- 
Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Reply via email to