No excuses. Thanks for calling it Chad. statuses/replies is an alias to statuses/mentions. statuses/replies will not be going away but we would prefer you to use statuses/mentions if at all possible.
Thanks, Doug -- Doug Williams Twitter Platform Support http://twitter.com/dougw On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Chad Etzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Um.. can we get a do over on that post, please? I think we got the > gist, but just to make sure that nothing was lost in translation > (since I'm spotting a few typos/omissions)... > > Thanks, > -Chad > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Doug Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > With the change from @replies -> mentions we the statuses/replies method > to > > statuses/mentions. Rest assured statuses/mentions will still be > available, > > but to reduce confusion and promote the new standard we removed > > statuses/replies in favor of statuses/mentions in the documentation. In > > other words statuses/replies is now a hidden alias to statuses/mentions. > > > > Thanks, > > Doug > > -- > > > > Doug Williams > > Twitter Platform Support > > http://twitter.com/dougw > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Arnaud <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I just noticed the /statuses/replies method was not mentionned anymore > >> on the Twitter API wiki. It's quite disturbing, as I didn't see > >> anything in the changelogs. Is this method deprecated? Is it going to > >> be? Or is it some kind of symlink to /statuses/mentions ? > >> > >> All the best, > >> Arnaud. > > > > >
