Sounds like a bad idea simply because the name of it IS
'in_REPLY_to_status_id', and retweets aren't replies.

I wonder if Twitter will adopt retweets in any way, in the same way
they did with replies?

On Jun 22, 7:08 pm, Chad Etzel <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the moment, I'll skip my rant about how stupid I think the "via"
> mechanism is, but I'm starting to notice a trend that several clients
> are now starting to set the in_reply_to_status_id data when the tweet
> is in fact a retweet/repost.
>
> I'm not sure how I feel about this.  One the one hand, they aren't
> replies, so it just seems like noise. One the other hand, it does give
> a direct link to the original source.
>
> How do others feel about this?
> -Chad

Reply via email to