Done.

http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=740&colspec=ID%20Stars%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Owner%20Summary%20Opened%20Modified%20Component

Cheers,
--
Yusuke Yamamoto
yus...@mac.com

this email is: [x] bloggable/twittable [ ] ask first [ ] private
follow me on : http://twitter.com/yusukeyamamoto
subscribe me at : http://yusuke.homeip.net/blog/

On 6月24日, 午後12:56, Doug Williams <d...@twitter.com> wrote:
> I'm seeing that, too. Can you open a ticket?
>
> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
>
> --
> Do you follow me?http://twitter.com/dougw
>
> 2009/6/23 H12山本 裕介 <yus...@mac.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > After the change, the API started to return status code:403 when there
> > is no matching tweets.
> > It used to be returning status code 404.
> > Will this be a permanent behavior?
> > -----------
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]GET
> >http://search.twitter.com/search.json?q=from%3Atwit4j+doesnothit
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Twitter-Client-URL:
> >http://yusuke.homeip.net/twitter4j/en/twitter4j-undefined.xml
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Accept-Encoding: gzip
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]User-Agent: twitter4j
> >http://yusuke.homeip.net/twitter4j/
> > /undefined
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Twitter-Client-Version: undefined
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Response:
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Age: 0
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Served-From: searchdb014
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Content-Length: 53
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Expires: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:55:32 GMT
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Served-By: searchweb014.twitter.com
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Connection: close
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Server: hi
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Cache: MISS
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Cache-Control: max-age=60, must-
> > revalidate, max-age=300
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Status: 403 Forbidden
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Varnish: 120647426
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:50:32 GMT
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Vary: Accept-Encoding
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Content-Encoding: gzip
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Via: 1.1 varnish
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]X-Cache-Svr: searchweb014.twitter.com
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]Content-Type: application/json;
> > charset=utf-8
> > [Wed Jun 24 12:50:31 JST 2009]{"error":"Exceptions::NoResults"}
> > -----------
>
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Yusuke Yamamoto
> > yus...@mac.com
>
> > this email is: [x] bloggable/twittable [ ] ask first [ ] private
> > follow me on :http://twitter.com/yusukeyamamoto
> > subscribe me at :http://yusuke.homeip.net/blog/
>
> > On 6月24日, 午後12:44, Chad Etzel <jazzyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yep, looking good.
>
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Brooks Bennett<bsbenn...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > Looks fixed now. Thanks!
>
> > > > On Jun 23, 9:24 pm, Matt Sanford <m...@twitter.com> wrote:
> > > >> This was not intentional and I'm trying to get to the bottom of it
> > now.
>
> > > >> -- Matt
>
> > > >> On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:05 PM, Chad Etzel wrote:
>
> > > >> > Yeah, all of my timestamps are now busted and I'm just finding
> > out...
> > > >> > It looks like this was just a change in the Search API format, and
> > not
> > > >> > the REST API format? Is that correct?
>
> > > >> > Going bonkers,
> > > >> > -Chad
>
> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Christopher
> > > >> > Finke<cfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> >> Around 7:45pm Central time, I noticed that the format of the
> > > >> >> created_at timestamp changed from "Fri, 15 May 2009 14:41:50 +0000"
> > > >> >> to
> > > >> >> "2009-05-15 14:41:50 UTC".  Was this change intentional?  If so,
> > was
> > > >> >> it communicated anywhere?  We had to rush out a fix to our app in
> > > >> >> order to change the format string we were using to parse the date.
>
> > > >> >> (The true issue, of course, is that Python needs a strtotime() like
> > > >> >> PHP. :-)
>
> > > >> >> Chris

Reply via email to