That's probably true, but I don't believe in trying to "game" Twitter.
It's a very stupid strategy in the long run. If you want a Twitter
application that fits into the Twitter ecosystem and will be around
for a long time, the best strategy is to be a good and upstanding
neighbor of Twitter.

On Jul 3, 12:29 pm, Chad Etzel <jazzyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could call your application "web"....
>
> /snark
> -chad
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Abraham Williams<4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think so.
>
> > Abraham
>
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:57, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Abraham,
>
> >> Is this optional? Meaning, can one register an OAuth application and
> >> still not have a custom "from xxxx" on the tweets originating from
> >> that application?
>
> >> On Jul 3, 11:44 am, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > There is no approval process anymore. To have a custom "from xxxx" all
> >> > you
> >> > have to do is create an OAuth application.
>
> >> > Abraham
>
> >> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:40, shiplu <shiplu....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > No doubt it will be closed.
> >> > > But from now on twitter should approve more applications. Cause many
> >> > > applications are using this "from web" and converted to "from API".
> >> > > Soon they will apply for approval.
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > A K M Mokaddim
> >> > >http://talk.cmyweb.net
> >> > >http://twitter.com/shiplu
> >> > > Stop Top Posting !!
> >> > > বাংলিশ লেখার চাইতে বাংলা লেখা অনেক ভাল
>
> >> > --
> >> > Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist |http://web608.org
> >> > Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham
> >> > Project |http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
> >> > This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
>
> > --
> > Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist |http://web608.org
> > Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham
> > Project |http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
> > This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.

Reply via email to