The one client we are having the most issues with is simple a
timeline / DM checker for iPhone push notifications...  because these
are ALL get request I'ved made sure that they all have the follow
location enabled now.

Just oAuth and random blocking/rate limiting that I hope they work on
next :)

On Aug 9, 6:16 pm, Naveen Ayyagari <knig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see this behavior 1/4 times I call rate_limit_status and I call  
> rate_limit_status every 5 minutes..
> On Aug 8, 2009, at 9:01 PM, CaMason wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > To confirm, I am also seeing this behaviour. Some output I've received
> > on numerous occasions this evening:
>
> > -bash-3.2# curl --interface 
> > eth0http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml
> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/
> > TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/strict.dtd">
> > <!-- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
> > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";> -->
> > <HTML>
> > <HEAD>
> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="0.1">
> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache">
> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Expires" CONTENT="-1">
> > <TITLE></TITLE>
> > </HEAD>
> > <BODY><P></BODY>
> > </HTML>
>
> > -Craig
>
> > On Aug 8, 11:25 pm, Chad Etzel <c...@twitter.com> wrote:
> >> Hmm, it shouldn't be spitting back HTML. How often are you seeing  
> >> this?
> >> -Chad
>
> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Naveen Ayyagari<knig...@gmail.com>  
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Sometimes the rate_limit_status call is not returning a 302 to
> >>> redirect, or the rate_limit_status xml, but HTML with a meta refresh
> >>> in it (which curl doesnt understand to follow redirect/retry).
>
> >>> Its not huge problem for us, but it can affect some throttling code
> >>> people may or may not be implementing. (when you get this  
> >>> response, a
> >>> subsequent retry request usually succeeds 95% of the time)
>
> >>> Here is an example response I am talking about:
>
> >>> curlhttp://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml-L-v
> >>> * About to connect() to twitter.com port 80 (#0)
> >>> *   Trying 168.143.162.68... connected
> >>> * Connected to twitter.com (168.143.162.68) port 80 (#0)
> >>>  > GET /account/rate_limit_status.xml HTTP/1.1
> >>>  > User-Agent: curl/7.18.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.18.2
> >>> OpenSSL/0.9.8g zlib/1.2.3.3 libidn/1.8
> >>>  > Host: twitter.com
> >>>  > Accept: */*
>
> >>> * HTTP 1.0, assume close after body
> >>> < HTTP/1.0 200 OK
> >>> < Connection: Close
> >>> < Pragma: no-cache
> >>> < cache-control: no-cache
> >>> < Refresh: 0.1
> >>> < Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> >>> <
> >>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" 
> >>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/strict.dtd
> >>> ">
> >>> <!-- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
> >>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";> -->
> >>> <HTML>
> >>> <HEAD>
> >>> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="0.1">
> >>> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache">
> >>> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Expires" CONTENT="-1">
> >>> <TITLE></TITLE>
> >>> </HEAD>
> >>> <BODY><P></BODY>
> >>> </HTML>
>
> >>> On Aug 8, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Chad Etzel wrote:
>
> >>>> Hmm,
>
> >>>> Unfortunately this 302 business will completely goof OAuth calls.
>
> >>>> If you are able to programmatically see that you are getting these
> >>>> redirects, try calling the account/rate_limit_status call [1] (it
> >>>> could be any call, but this one is "free" and is a GET). You should
> >>>> still get a 302 (I'm pretty sure). Then if you jump through the
> >>>> redirect hoops with this call, it should clear you from more  
> >>>> 302's for
> >>>> a while.
>
> >>>> I'm out today, but if someone could try this and report back if it
> >>>> works that would be helpful.
>
> >>>> [1]http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method%3A-account%C2%A0ra
> >>>> ...
>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Chad
>
> >>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 6:31 AM,
> >>>> timwhitlock<tim.whitl...@publicreative.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> I've seem the 302 Location headers having invalid URLs... i.e. two
> >>>>> "?"
> >>>>> symbols.
> >>>>> The original query string and then an additional "?" for the  
> >>>>> token at
> >>>>> the end.
> >>>>> Following this redirect blindly has resulted in a Forbidden  
> >>>>> response.
>
> >>>>> Also it is unclear whether the redirect location needs to be re-
> >>>>> signed? (I am not doing so, but may explain the 403?)
>
> >>>>> On Aug 8, 8:14 am, Rich <rhyl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Excellent our client now supports the 302's :)
>
> >>>>>> On Aug 8, 7:37 am, Chad Etzel <c...@twitter.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> You may have to follow redirects more than once *wink wink nudge
> >>>>>>> nudge*
>
> >>>>>>> with curl you can add --location flag. There's a good bit of  
> >>>>>>> info
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> the man page as well.
>
> >>>>>>> If using curl with PHP, you can set:
> >>>>>>> curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION, TRUE);
>
> >>>>>>> HTH,
> >>>>>>> -Chad
>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:31 AM, TjL<luo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> All of my scripts check for "Status 200" before proceeding.
>
> >>>>>>>> Now we are (sometimes) getting a 302, but when I try
>
> >>>>>>>> curl --netrc -s -D -http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml
>
> >>>>>>>> Gave me a 302 with a Location of:
>
> >>>>>>>>http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml?c73f7db0
>
> >>>>>>>> but when I tried
>
> >>>>>>>> curl --netrc -s -D - 
> >>>>>>>> 'http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml?c73f7db0'
>
> >>>>>>>> it seemed to want to redirect me to
>
> >>>>>>>>http://twitter.com/account/rate_limit_status.xml
>
> >>>>>>>> If "accepting 30x" is a requirement now, I'd like some advice  
> >>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>> how to do so.
>
> >>>>>>>> TjL

Reply via email to