Hi There,

What you all have been confirming is correct. The intended behavior is
20k per IP unauthenticated, and 20k per IP *per user* authenticated.
This is not a bug.

-Chad


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Abraham Williams<4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been reading "I have confirmed" emails from 5 different threads for the
> last 2 weeks. Can we hold off until Chad gets back to us with an official
> answer. :)
>
> Thanks
> Abraham
>
> 2009/8/13 Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Craig,
>>
>> I just ran a test, and I can also confirm what you have found.
>>
>> Unauthenticated calls decrease per IP 20,000
>> Authenticated calls decrease per-IP per-user 20,000
>>
>> Dewald
>>
>> On Aug 13, 4:27 pm, CaMason <stasisme...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > The behaviour at the moment is definitely as-described above:
>> >
>> > Unauthenticated calls decrease IP 20,000
>> > Authenticated calls decrease per-user 20,000
>> >
>> > My app only uses authenticated calls during normal use, and the IP-
>> > based limit isn't decreasing at-all
>> >
>> > 20,000 per-user is pretty silly - With 1000 users, I would be allowed
>> > to make 5,555 calls per second.
>> >
>> > A max of say 500 authenticated calls per-user would be more sensible,
>> > and would allow apps with many users to scale  :)
>> >
>> > -Craig
>
>
>
> --
> Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
> Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
> Project | http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
> This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
>

Reply via email to