thanks - i'll change my client code!

Joseph Cheek
jos...@cheek.com, www.cheek.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom



JDG wrote:
> Those will, so long as they haven't actually been suspended. As for
> your other question, you would only receive mentions from protected
> accounts that you were following (i.e. accounts to which you had access).
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:35, Joseph Cheek <jos...@cheek.com
> <mailto:jos...@cheek.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     will they be included in statuses/mentions?
>
>     Joseph
>
>     Hwee-Boon Yar wrote:
>     > Along the same line, updates from accounts considered spamming
>     > wouldn't be included in search results too.
>     >
>     > --
>     > Hwee-Boon
>     >
>     > On Sep 17, 12:07 am, JDG <ghil...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:ghil...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     >> I believe that search does not return statuses of protected
>     users (even when
>     >> authenticated, though I may be wrong and should be corrected if
>     I am). In
>     >> that case, yes, you could potentially receive fewer results than
>     >> statuses/mentions.
>     >>
>     >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:56, Joseph Cheek <jos...@cheek.com
>     <mailto:jos...@cheek.com>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>> Quick q:
>     >>>
>     >>> is there any time that a search for a screenname won't return
>     every
>     >>> tweet that statuses/mentions will?  i can see that it would
>     return more,
>     >>> but will it ever return less?
>     >>>
>
>

Reply via email to