Currently not really. Twitter might start enforcing correct designation at
some point though.
Abraham

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:33, cnunciato <cnunci...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi folks:
>
> I'm adding some Twitter integration to a desktop app, and I'm unhappy
> with the whole "copy/paste this PIN into your application" experience.
>
> In my case, I happen to have a browser instance containing the OAuth
> authentication process embedded within my desktop app, so it's
> possible to listen for redirection events that happen inside that
> browser and respond to them -- but when I mark my Twitter app as a
> "desktop" app (on the app-settings screen on Twitter, where it's
> defined), I'm forced into using the copy-this-PIN approach (because no
> callback URL can be specified for desktop apps), which, from a user-
> experience perspective, kinda sucks.
>
> I do notice, though, that if I make my app a "web" app instead, I can
> specify a callback URL, and have my app watch for redirections to that
> URL, which works quite well and provides a more seamless user
> experience.
>
> So my question is, is there any disadvanage to marking my installed
> desktop app a "web" app on Twitter, so I can take advantage of using a
> callback URL to provide a better user experience?  Is it a violation
> of terms of use or anything?  Any drawbacks at all?
>
> Thanks in advance --
>
> Chris
>



-- 
Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
http://web608.org/geeks/abraham/blogs/2009/10/03/win-google-wave-invite
This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Reply via email to