Hmm except this API payload doesn't match that for the home_timeline

Hometimeline shows retweet_status with a sub tag of retweeting_user,
but yet @ev's user timeline shows a tag of retweet_status with a
subtag of user.

I want to support it but not with the inconsistency in the API

On Oct 15, 5:18 pm, Martin <martin.duf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no problem with this new API call. But why is it also included
> in the user_timeline payload ?
> Is this inclusion official on the Twitter side...
>
> Martin
>
> On Oct 15, 9:46 am, ryan alford <ryanalford...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method:-statuses-home_tim...
> > <http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-REST-API-Method:-statuses-home_tim...>That
> > will be the new "Friends Timeline".  It will include retweets, while the
> > current "Friends Timeline" will not.  The current "Friends Timeline" will
> > also be going away at some point in the future.
>
> > Ryan
>
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Martin <martin.duf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks for the clarification.
>
> > > That explains the inconsistent behavior we are seeing when trying to
> > > load specific user timelines.
> > > Do we have an updated api wiki that defines the semantics of the
> > > <retweeted_status> fragment ?
>
> > > Martin
> > >www.wherecloud.com
>
> > > On Oct 14, 10:59 pm, Josh Roesslein <jroessl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I think its been enabled for a select few for testing. I don't think
> > > > its gone public yet.
>
> > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:56 PM, ryan alford <ryanalford...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Maybe the new retweet functionality has been turned on?
> > > > > Ryan
>
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Martin <martin.duf...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > >> I'm retrieving the timeline for a specific user:
>
> > > > >> curlhttp://www.twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/ev.xml
>
> > > > >> Within that timeline, I see retweeted_status fragment.
> > > > >> Is this normal behavior ?
>
> > > > >> Thanks - Martin
>
> > > > --
> > > > Josh

Reply via email to