Hi Steve,

This is expected behavior. From the documentation:

References matched are statuses that were:
-Created by a specified user
-Explicitly in-reply-to a status created by a specified user (pressed
reply "swoosh" button)
-Explicitly retweeted by a specified user (pressed retweet button)
-Created by a specified user and subsequently explicitly retweed by any user

Are you seeing "random" tweets that do not have in_reply_to set to any
of the ids in your follow list?


On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Steve Farrell <st...@farrell.org> wrote:
> Yes, I think that's exactly the case.  But not to one particular
> user_id, just a lot of (apparently) random people.
> On Sep 7, 7:30 pm, John Kalucki <jkalu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do the apparently extraneous tweets happen to be in_reply_to a
>> specified user_id?
>> -John Kaluckihttp://twitter.com/jkalucki
>> Services, Twitter Inc.
>> On Sep 5, 10:17 pm, SteveFarrell<st...@farrell.org> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> > I'm just getting started using the follow API.  We got access to
>> > "shadow" (thanks!) and I'm taking it for a spin now.  I'm following
>> > about 7k people.
>> > Something weird I've found is that I seem to routinely get tweets from
>> > users who were not included in my follow=parameter.  I think I must be
>> > doing something silly... or confused... anything I should look for?
>> > Here's a code fragment....
>> > req = Net::HTTP::Post.new url.path
>> > follow = Node.find(:all).map{|n| n.twitter_id}.join(",")
>> > req.set_form_data :follow=>follow

Reply via email to