OAuth is still in beta so when something goes wrong Twitter can fly the
*beta* flag. (Thanks Google)

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 09:30, ryan alford <ryanalford...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I never knew that asking questions would be considered "whining".
> Twitter has never officially stated that OAuth is in "production" like they
> announce other features (like Lists).  Now they seem to be telling
> developers to start moving to OAuth.
> You state to "don't" use it.  It doesn't look like we will have much of a
> choice soon.  Twitter is recommending third-parties move to OAuth.  Looks
> like it won't be long before basic auth is depreciated.
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Duane Roelands 
> <duane.roela...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> Use it or don't, and own your decision.  It works.  It's stable.  It's
>> more secure than Basic Auth.  It's what Twitter wants you to use.
>> What's the problem here?
>> So tired of OAuth whining.
>> > If Twitter OAuth is stable enough for Twitter to recommend that that
>> > all third-party applications connect through OAuth connection, then
>> > move it out of beta and into production mode, and announce it as such.
>> > If not, then don't make that recommendation.

Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
Project | Awesome Lists | http://twitterli.st
This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Madison, WI, United States

Reply via email to