On Jan 18, 8:03 pm, John Kalucki <j...@twitter.com> wrote: > 3) You should have two accounts (and thus streams) at elevated access > levels, one for follow and one for track, that perform the bulk of your > work. You should also use two accounts at default access level for follow > and track to find recent deltas without disrupting your main streams too > often. Once the default streams are "full", you'll have to cycle the main > streams.
So that's four accounts? Is that part of the EULA we'd need to sign - that we'll have four connections open? > 5) You can use the geo tag feature, but the volume is so low. We don't have > a feature in the Streaming API that allows selecting statuses by the > self-reported profile information yet. Is that in the works? I'm not sure I can think of a use case for it, given that the marketing analytics folks are going to be going all out to encourage at least smart-phone users to enable automatic geotagging. For lower-frequency / lower-accuracy use cases, I'm pretty sure I can build a list of people who are based in PDX without resorting to high-powered technologies. Especially once I get 1500 REST API calls per hour with oAuth. ;-) The non-profits are also interested in promoting geotagging. I was in a meeting on the subject last Tuesday. (some of the slides are at http://maps2.humaninet.org/2010/01/18/january-12th-mapping-presentations/). In short, I think geotagging is going to grow as fast as smart-phones and other location-aware Twitter clients grow. (As an aside, those in the meeting were unaware that the earthquake in Haiti had happened during the meeting.) -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky http://borasky-research.net/smart-at-znmeb I've never met a happy clam. In fact, most of them were pretty steamed.