Raffi, Have you tried it? There is no OAuth flow. I.e., the user types in his Twitter username and password. That's it.
If it is indeed using OAuth, does that mean that the background requesting of tokens when you have the Twitter credentials is now available? Meaning, I can also now use it to convert all existing Twitter accounts to OAuth in one fell swoop? On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, Raffi Krikorian <[email protected]> wrote: > seesmic look, i believe, is using oauth talking to api.twitter.com. > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dewald Pretorius <[email protected]> wrote: > > Raffi, > > > What's going on here? > > > Your credibility is at stake here. You've been telling us in many > > posts that new apps must use OAuth to get a source attribution, and > > only old grandfathered apps have source attribution with Basic Auth. > > > On Feb 2, 11:18 pm, Dewald Pretorius <[email protected]> wrote: > > > At first I thought they must have changed the old Seesmic source to > > > Seesmic Look. > > > > But no. > > > > Here's a recent tweet from Seesmic: > >http://twitter.com/CathyBrooks/status/8570217879 > > > > And here's a recent one from Seesmic Look: > >http://twitter.com/adamse/status/8565271563 > > > > Seesmic Look uses Basic Auth. > > > > Does anyone else spot Mt Everest on this level playing field of ours? > > > > On Feb 2, 10:41 pm, Pedro Junior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > *Seesmic Look is old? > > > > * > > > > - > > > > Pedro Junior > > > > > 2010/2/2 Lukas Müller <[email protected]> > > > > > > Only old apps can do this. New apps cannot use it. > > -- > Raffi Krikorian > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi
