I don't think Twitter should develop its API in accordance with, or
let API design decisions be influenced by deficiencies in third-party

Your API should adhere to specs, and third-party libraries should
follow suit.

The OAuth spec has said from Version 1: "Parameters are sorted by
name, using lexicographical byte value ordering. If two or more
parameters share the same name, they are sorted by their value."

On Mar 11, 4:27 pm, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com>
> It wasn't a factor in this particular design decision, but the reality
> is that the vast majority of OAuth libraries out there are not to
> spec.
> Taylor Singletary
> Developer Advocate, Twitterhttp://twitter.com/episod
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dossy Shiobara <do...@panoptic.com> wrote:
> > So, poor OAuth implementations are forcing a poor technical design
> > decision in Twitter's product?
> > Tread carefully ...
> > On 3/11/10 1:38 PM, Taylor Singletary wrote:
> >> While it's a standard to use multiple values for the same key in this
> >> way, there are a gigantic amount of OAuth libraries out there that
> >> don't account for it and will botch the request as a result.
> > --
> > Dossy Shiobara              | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/
> > Panoptic Computer Network   |http://panoptic.com/
> >  "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
> >    folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)

Reply via email to