List membership is as important as followers in terms of reach of a twitter
account (I won't say person, as bots and group-run corporate accounts also
have followers and get on lists). If you cannot easily see haw many lists a
person is on, you can't see
a) how relevant / influential they are to their current followers; and
b) the potential reach, beyond the n. followers they already have, that the
lists represent.
At the moment I permanently follow three lists created by other people, on
which more than half the people I don't follow, I'm sure there are plenty of
other people (especially tweetdeck users, where it is so easy) who do the
same thing.
For these reasons, I would say putting the list count in the user object
would provide us and our users with very useful additional piece of data.
Cheers, Nigel.

On 2 April 2010 07:19, Damon C <> wrote:

> I heard somewhere that the list count is supposed to be included in
> the user object at some point, although I can't remember where I heard
> that/what the timeline was.
> Until then, best solution appears to be (I hate to say it) scraping
> the website. Otherwise, the API calls could get out of hand for users
> on a ton of lists.
> Damon
> On Apr 1, 10:20 pm, "Orian Marx (@orian)" <> wrote:
> > Yeah this was logged in the bug tracker I think the day lists were
> > rolled out to the public, but it looks like it never received an
> > official response and is still marked as a "new" entry. :(
> >
> > On Apr 1, 5:16 pm, DustyReagan <> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I was wondering if it'd be possible to get the number of lists a user
> > > belongs to returned in the User object. I noticed the list count is
> > > displayed beside status, follower, and following counts all over
> > > Twitter, looks like the list count may be on the same level as the
> > > other counts. I'd like to include the list counts in my application
> > > without making additional API calls. Possibility?
> --
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.

Reply via email to