Why shorten links that won't count for 140 limit and are not viewed by user? It will only add un-needed requests and waste values on the twiter shortener.
André Luís On Apr 15, 2010 2:18 p.m., "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[email protected]> wrote: I'm thinking of something like the RFC process for Internet protocols. By the way, on a related note, once the "Twitter link shortener" I've been hearing rumors about is in place, can we have all the links in tweets sent from the API shortened with it? Profile images, user object URLs, etc. ;-) Part of this stems from my concern over something I thought I heard yesterday about Twitter building its own "place" database. There are dozens of place databases - why does Twitter need another one? On Apr 15, 6:05 am, Raffi Krikorian <[email protected]> wrote: > please feel free to point us to standards that you would like us to > consider. we are really att... > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:09 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ----- "Jud" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 14, 5:05 pm, James Teters <jtet...@gmail.... -- To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
