Hi, Any updates on this issue? I'm running into the same problem and have not yet been able to resolve it.
Regards, Gero On May 1, 12:42 am, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > Thanks for chiming in about Scribe. I'll take a look again soon at Scribe > and see if I can ascertain its potential fault (or our own if that is the > case). > > Keep up the good work on your OAuth library, Pablo! :) > > Taylor Singletary > Developer Advocate, Twitterhttp://twitter.com/episod > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Pablo Fernandez <fernandezpabl...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > Hi Taylor! > > > I believe Rahul is having this problem while using my library (http:// > > github.com/fernandezpablo85/scribe) > > > I've tested myself, I'm pretty sure the error lies in my code but I > > can't tell why :S > > > Here's the string that gets signed and the OAuth header in case that > > helps! > > > String to sign >> > > > POST&http%3A%2F%2Fapi.twitter.com%2F1%2Fstatuses > > %2Fupdate.xml&oauth_consumer_key%3D6icbcAXyZx67r8uTAUM5Qw%26oauth_nonce > > %3D32c0b090041a4b233a36590a10c8749e%26oauth_signature_method%3DHMAC- > > SHA1%26oauth_timestamp%3D1272666648%26oauth_token%3D14654522- > > ayJ064ck0Gtp1ABmjVVxMqd0OcgIG0fMRPFxN00E%26oauth_version%3D1.0%26status > > %3DScribe%2520works.%2520Hell%2520yeah%2521 > > > OAuth header >> > > > OAuth oauth_consumer_key="6icbcAXyZx67r8uTAUM5Qw", > > oauth_nonce="32c0b090041a4b233a36590a10c8749e", > > oauth_signature="hmzME2L2qAmzRYOj5P%2BBcja9ECg%3D", > > oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1", oauth_timestamp="1272666648", > > oauth_token="14654522-ayJ064ck0Gtp1ABmjVVxMqd0OcgIG0fMRPFxN00E", > > oauth_version="1.0" > > > Pablo > > > PS: Kudos for developer.twitter.com. the site rocks! > > > On Apr 30, 3:34 pm, Rahul <rahul.jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Taylor, > > > > Here you go. I have tried adding the content type as follows. > > > > conn.setRequestProperty("Content-Type", "application/x-www-form- > > > urlencoded"); > > > > But this doesn't help at all and i still continue receiving the same > > > error of incorrect signature. > > > > Any guess? > > > > Thanks,Rahul > > > > On Apr 29, 9:03 pm,Rahul<rahul.jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Taylor, > > > > > I am presently using scribe java library for OAuth and as you said all > > > > spec compliant libraries the signature base string will only contain > > > > POST body parameter so does this one. > > > > > Also I will try to add the header 'Content-Type' to the library and > > > > let you know how it goes. > > > > > Thanks, > > > >Rahul > > > > > On Apr 29, 5:38 pm, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Whether it matters before creating your signature or not depends > > entirely on > > > > > the OAuth library you are using. In spec-compliant OAuth libraries, > > the > > > > > signature base string will only contain POST body parameters when > > they are > > > > > of the application/x-www-form-urlencoded type -- most OAuth libraries > > need a > > > > > way to be instructed on the disposition of the content being passed > > as the > > > > > POST body and a common way is to look at an abstract request object > > of some > > > > > kind to determine the type of data being piped in rather than just > > trying to > > > > > guess or simply assuming that POST bodies will always be of the > > URL-encoded > > > > > type. There might be another way to instruct your library on the > > disposition > > > > > of data, but it's likely it'll just assume all POST data provided is > > of the > > > > > URL encoded variety. I don't think you have any issues with your code > > in > > > > > this area today. > > > > > > But as a best practice when dealing with an HTTP-based API of any > > kind, you > > > > > should be sending a Content-Type header whenever POSTing or PUTing > > any kind > > > > > of payload. You don't pass a Content-Type header on a GET because > > there is > > > > > no content being sent. > > > > > > It's likely that your OAuth library automatically sends the proper > > > > > Content-Type header on the OAuth negotiation steps because those > > steps are > > > > > required to use URL-encoded POST bodies by the spec. > > > > > > Taylor Singletary > > > > > Developer Advocate, Twitterhttp://twitter.com/episodOnThu, Apr 29, > > 2010 at 2:20 PM,Rahul<rahul.jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > So what are trying to say is that i should explicitly add > > Content-type > > > > > > header in the message going out and that too before creating the > > > > > > signature? > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > >Rahul > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 4:58 pm, Taylor Singletary < > > taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Since you're sending a status, you should be setting a > > Content-Type > > > > > > header > > > > > > > to indicate the type of payload -- it's best never to assume that > > a HTTP > > > > > > > server or a HTTP library will know how to understand a payload > > without > > > > > > being > > > > > > > explicitly told what kind of payload that is. The signature might > > be > > > > > > > mis-calculating on the Twitter side due to not including your > > parameters > > > > > > > when constructing it. > > > > > > > > Taylor Singletary > > > > > > > Developer Advocate, Twitterhttp://twitter.com/episod > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM,Rahul<rahul.jun...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > To answer your questions. The following is the body response i > > receive > > > > > > > > back > > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > > > > > > <hash> > > > > > > > > <request>/1/statuses/update.xml</request> > > > > > > > > <error>Incorrect signature</error> > > > > > > > > </hash> > > > > > > > > > Also, I am not setting any content type header at this point & > > I am > > > > > > > > using "POST" only for token negotiation. and have not tried any > > get > > > > > > > > restricted resource yet. I did try some but they seem to be > > public > > > > > > > > timeline etc which seems to be working good. > > > > > > > > > Any help on this is highly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > >Rahul > > > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 4:22 pm, Taylor Singletary < > > taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > HiRahul, > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to think of other reasons. We might be throwing > > the > > > > > > invalid > > > > > > > > > signature error in a case where the signature is not in fact > > invalid. > > > > > > > > > > How about requests are not of the type POST? Have you had a > > GET > > > > > > (other > > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > OAuth token negotiation steps) work for you? When you were > > doing the > > > > > > > > token > > > > > > > > > negotiation steps, were you using POSTs or GETs? When > > performing a > > > > > > POST, > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > you setting your HTTP Content-Type header to > > > > > > > > > "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"? > > > > > > > > > > What's the exact response from the server? There's usually a > > payload > > > > > > > > > included with the response that may give more clarity to the > > error. > > > > > > We > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > some upcoming enhancements to the OAuth implementation that > > will > > > > > > return > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > you the "signature base string we calculated" which would be > > useful > > > > > > here > > > > > > > > > now.. > > > > > > > > > > Taylor Singletary > > > > > > > > > Developer Advocate, Twitterhttp://twitter.com/episod > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:12 PM,Rahul<rahul.jun...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Taylor, > > > > > > > > > > > A quick update on this. I tried generating the signature > > from my > > > > > > > > > > library and the page mentioned below they both seems tbe > > exactly > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > same..... > > >http://hueniverse.com/2008/10/beginners-guide-to-oauth-part-iv-signin. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > What else can be the reason and how come twitter is > > responding with > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect Signature ? > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > >Rahul > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 1:19 pm,Rahul<rahul.jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Taylor, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for taking a look at it. and to answer your > > question yes I > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > > > pass the status in the signature basetring. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also below is my string which i pass to the below > > mentioned > > > > > > toSign > > > > > > > > > > > variable. > > > > > > > > > > > > toSign: > > > > > > > > > > > POST&https%3A%2F%2Fapi.twitter.com%2F1%2Fstatuses > > > %2Fupdate.xml&oauth_consumer_key%xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%26oauth_nonce > > > %3Df2756a360f610d375722ee97e4c2391f%26oauth_signature_method%3DHMAC- > > > SHA1%26oauth_timestamp%3D1272560943%26oauth_token%3D36554645- > > > > > > > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%26oauth_version%3D1.0%26status > > > > > > > > > > > %3Dhurrrrrrrrrrrrrray > > > > > > > > > > > > Mac mac = Mac.getInstance(HMAC_SHA1); > > > > > > > > > > > mac.init(key); > > > > > > > > > > > byte[] bytes = mac.doFinal(toSign.getBytes(UTF8)); > > > > > > > > > > > > and in the key i pass: consumerSecret + '&' + tokenSecret > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > >Rahul > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 12:46 pm, Taylor Singletary < > > > > > > taylorsinglet...@twitter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > HiRahul, > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you are POSTing to statuses/update.xml -- are you > > > > > > including > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > status > > > > > > > > > > > > that you are posting in your signature base string? As > > a > > > > > > > > URL-encoded > > > > > > > > > > > > parameter, it should be included in both your POST body > > and the > > > > > > > > > > signature > > > > > > > > > > > > base string (but not in the HTTP authorization header). > > > > > > > > > > > > > Taylor Singletary > > > > > > > > > > > > Developer Advocate, > > ... > > read more »
