I may be being naive but i fail to see the fill issues with having the
key and secret public.

What are they going to do with it? the user would still have to agree
to use the app in question that is posing as a legitimate app.

The genuine app only needs to get a new secret once a vulnerability is
found. And end users need to learn to only download the app from the
official source.

I maybe completely off the mark, so please don't shoot me down.

On Jun 11, 11:56 pm, Taylor Singletary <taylorsinglet...@twitter.com>
wrote:
> Hi Developers,
>
> As has been discussed on the list recently, OAuth and Open Source
> applications are a difficult combination because token secrets shouldn't be
> embedded in widely distributed code.
>
> We're pleased to announce that we've devised a solution to this problem.
>
> Next week, we plan to release a new extension to the Twitter API that will
> allow Open Source applications to obtain OAuth consumer keys and secrets for
> their users, without having to distribute an application secret.
>
> Approved Open Source client applications will have an easy to implement
> ability, through dev.twitter.com, to generate new client tokens & secrets to
> be used specifically for each new instance of the application.
>
> While completing the process does require the end-user to complete a few
> extra operations, we think this is a good compromise.
>
> The source tag on tweets published by the child applications generated with
> this approach will be a variation on the originating application's name. For
> examples, if the name of the parent application was "AdventureTweet" and the
> user's screen name was @zork, then the child application's name would be
> "AdventureTweet (zork)".
>
> The work flow for these applications will be something like this:
>
>   1. You store your API Consumer Key in your application distribution (but
> never your secret!).
>   2. A user downloads/installs/checks out your open source application and
> runs it for the first time
>   3. Your application builds a URL to our key exchange endpoint, using your
> consumer key.
>       
> Example:http://dev.twitter.com/apps/key_exchange?oauth_consumer_key=abcdefghi...
>   4. You send the user to that URL in whatever way makes sense in your
> environment.
>   5. That user will have to login using their Twitter credentials (if they
> aren't already), and then approve your application's request to replicate
> itself on the user's behalf.
>   6. The approval will require that the user agrees to our terms of service,
> as this process results in them having control of their own application
>   7. The user is presented with a string that they are asked to paste into
> your application. The string will contain ah API key and secret, in addition
> to an access token and token secret for the member: everything that's needed
> to get the user up and running in your application.
>   8. The user pastes the string into your application, which then consumes
> and stores it to begin performing API calls using OAuth.
>
> The string containing the keys will be x-www-form-urlencoded. To keep the
> string brief, it will contain abbreviated key names.
>
> An example:
> ck=KIyzzZUM7KvKYOpnst2aOw&cs=4PQk1eH4MadmzzEZ1G1KdrWHIFC1IPxv1kXZg0G3E&at=542212-utEhFTv5GZZcc2R4w6thnApKtf1N1eKRedcFJthdeA&ats=FFdeOzzzzEwxOBWPPREd55dKx7AAaI8NfpK7xnibv4Yls
>
> Where: "ck" - consumer key, "cs" - consumer secret, "at" - access token,
> "ats" - access token secret
>
> This kind of key requisition service is new to the Twitter ecosystem, and
> we're going to be closely monitoring it for abuse. Once we announce its
> availability, we'll begin taking requests for Open Source applications that
> would like to offer the feature in their application.
>
> We're excited to offer this solution to the open source community. Thanks
> everyone!
>
> Taylor Singletary
> Developer Advocate, Twitterhttp://twitter.com/episod

Reply via email to